Census of India, 1911, Vol. XIV; Punjab; Part II.-Tables

· 1912 · Public domain (published pre-1930) · archive.org ↗

1TABLE IL

2~ VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1881,

3«+. , L.t;-In this table figures of the present censis are *8empared with those

4of the previous censuses. The latter in some cases differ from the figurés given

5in the old census reports. ~ This is due to territorial changes during the last

6decade: Population of the areas transferred has been taken into account and .

7the figures of the past censuses adjusted accordingly.

82. The total population of the Province in 1881, 1891 and 1901 has

9"been increased by 159, 152 and 161 persons, respectively, on account of trans-

10fer of area from Saharanpur in the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh to the

11Karnal District during the past decade. On the other hand, a reduction of

1256, 127 and 163 persons, respectively, has been made owing to transfer from

131881 1891 1903.

14(1) Hissar to Bikaner State aE wo 56 110 8 128

15(2) Karnalto Muzaffarnagar in the United

16Provinces of Agra and Ondh “

17. see 2 19

18(3) Dera Ghazi Khon to Dera Ismai) Khan in

192 the N..W. F, Province_ “ ids dite. sees 15 16

20Total 56 127 168

218. There have been changes of jurisdiction during the last decade in

22all the Districts except Rohtak, Gurgaon, Delhi, Simla, Kangra, Jullundur,

23Amritsar, Gurdaspur, Sialkot, Gujrat and Multan. . |

244. No census was taken in the Punjab in 1872, and consequently the

25columns relating to the census of 1872 have been omitted from the table.